patches

[Eric Pouech]

Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
> Eric Pouech wrote:
> 
>> Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
>>
>>> Is anything wrong with these?
>>> http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020521.html
>>> http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/020550.html
>>
>>
>>
>> DDK isn't public information. Do we want Wine tree to be tainted by 
>> non cleanly reversed engineered information ?
>> A+
>>
> Excuse my language but WTF? The EULA of the DDK is very similar to that 
> of the SDK, it's freely available for the cost of shipping and handling, 
> and we can write our own DDK headers just as we can write the SDK ones.
> 
> Ivan.
> 
> 
from EULA:
> 1.1 General License Grant. Microsoft grants to you a personal, non-exclusive, nontransferable, royalty-free license to use the Software, and to make and use five (5) copies of the Software on one or more computers located at your premises solely for the purpose of designing, developing and testing drivers that operate in conjunction with the Software for use with Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server, Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server and Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server; Microsoft Windows XP, Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1; Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition, Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition operating system products and any Microsoft operating system product that is a successor to any of the foregoing (each an "OS Product").
isn't that enough ?

A+

-- 
Eric Pouech