patches

[Robert Lunnon]

On Sunday 11 September 2005 19:04, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Robert Lunnon wrote:
> >This might be a moot point. In general it isn't possible to copyright an
> >Interface definition under most copyright jurisdictions  (other wise
> > merely using the interface in your own program would be a copyright
> > violation). So the exact header "expression" is protected IE you can't
> > just copy the file. But you can redescribe the interface in a file of
> > your own.
> >
> >Bob
>
> Then that applies to the DDK too.
>
> Ivan.

I would think so .... at least this is my interpretation of the Australian 
law, but I'm not a Lawyer.