[PATCH 1/3] winedos: better MSCDEX emulation

[Alexandre Julliard]

Petr Tesarik <hat at tesarici.cz> writes:

> Now, I've found some (minor) bugs in the device driver code, and I
> fixed them along the way. IMO what you need is that:
>
>   1. First, I send a patch that moves the (buggy) code to a separate
>      function which can be called both by the INT2F handler and by the
>      interrupt routine.
>
>   2. Next, I send a patch fixing the bugs.
>
> Is that right?

Yes, each separate change must be a separate patch. If you are moving
code, you should send a patch that does just that, without changing
anything else. If you are fixing bugs send one patch per bug.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org