resend add missing glyph code to GetGlyphIndices
lats at yless4u.com.au
Mon Aug 14 05:22:09 CDT 2006
Andreas Mohr wrote:
>This should have gone into a comment right there because it's
>a very normal reaction to immediately question code like that,
>so the code should properly defend itself by default ;)
>IOW just the usual "do coding as obvious as possible, then properly comment
>everything else that isn't obvious".
>Maybe something like
>/* called in a loop, but missing glyph shouldn't happen often
> so we don't want to call it outside the loop, always */
Makes sense now that you mention it.
More information about the wine-devel