safedisc

[Saulius Krasuckas]

* On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> * Monday, November 21, 2005, 4:54:56 PM, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> > Raphael Junqueira asked on bugzilla what the safedisc status is. 
> > Currently it works fine, and I believe what we have is more or less 
> > ready for CVS. However Vitaly told me Alexandre didn't like the object 
> > manager Vitaly wrote, mostly he didn't like permanent objects, that 
> > drivers depend on. 
> 
> Following Alexandre's suggestions I've managed to get OM working without 
> support for permanent objects. There will be some modification required 
> for ntoskrnl for that to work. I'm just about finished integrating new 
> OM into ntoskrnl tree and almost ready to give it a try.
> 
> As far as OM goes it's mostly finished and passes all but two of om 
> tests. Also it don't see any side-affects from it either. All the 
> programs I've tested work in the same way as they were before. All named 
> object moved to directories and using RootDirectory part of 
> OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES for create/open.
> 
> Attached is the final revision of the directory object implementation. 
> If it looks ok I'm ready to send some patches <g>

Any updates on this?  What lefts to be done for ntoskrnl to enter the 
tree? :)