[Compile problem] GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL
vs. GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI
Vitaly Budovski
vbudovsk at cs.rmit.edu.au
Sun Mar 5 20:55:59 CST 2006
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>>>>>> "H" == H Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>
> ...
> >> Appended patch lets me circumvent that problem.
> H> I'm not sure if GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL and GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI are
> H> interchangeable, but more importantly it makes the same kind of
> H> assumptions about what's going to be defined.
>
> I said "circumvent" not "solve"...
>
This patch
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-March/024775.html
should solve the problem with missing defines.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list