Anybody have a RegDeleteTree[A|W] implementation lying around?

Segin segin2005 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 10 16:58:49 CDT 2006


Brad DeMorrow wrote:
> Is Anyone currently working on this?
> 
> If Not - I would like to start working on this part myself, it seems
> like it
> is fairly simple - but tedious work :-)
> 
> Shouldn't be too much of a hassle and should help a little
> 
> --Brad DeMorrow
> 
> 
> On 9/28/06, Frank Richter <frank.richter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 28.09.2006 15:26, Paul Vriens wrote:
>> > I'll have a few hours tomorrow and will have a look. The cleanest
>> > solution for now seems to create RegDeleteTree[A|W] in advapi32 and use
>> > that wherever possible (unless we find that it forwards to shlwapi).
>> > Most DLL's already import advapi32.
>>
>> Hmm... isn't advapi32 "lower level" than shlwapi? I'd expect that if
>> forwarding takes place then it'd be shlwapi->advapi32.
>>
>> -f.r.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
Some Google searching provides that there may or may not be an
implementation.

http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-svn/2005-August/005303.html
([ros-svn] [weiden] 17572: implemented RegDeleteTree() (untested!))
mentions this, and nothing more:
--- CUT ---
implemented RegDeleteTree() (untested!)

Updated files:
trunk/reactos/lib/advapi32/reg/reg.c
--- CUT ---
The code moved around in their tree a bit, it's actually
trunk/reactos/dll/win32/advapi32/reg/reg.c, and you can view the code here:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/advapi32/reg/reg.c?view=markup
-- 
The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is: the language just sucks.
	-- Linus Torvalds

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20061010/f8228961/signature.pgp


More information about the wine-devel mailing list