Add IRunnableObject stub implementation

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

Hi,
I will wait on sending tests on this one.
Until the first one gets in
(http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-September/030659.html)
Then I will resend with tests.
Or may be I will write tests and send them seperately, it really
depends on mood tommorrow afternoon.

bye,
VJ
On 10/11/06, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> > On 10/10/06, Huw Davies <huw at codeweavers.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:45:40PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > > > Add IRunnableObject stub implementation,
> > >
> > > It's not at all clear to me what this interface should do in this
> > > context.  Could you at least add a test that shows that the domdoc
> > > object should expose IRunnableObject?
> >
> > Check the bug# 6341 [http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6341 ]
> > previously I sent a patch
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-September/030659.html
> > No response, so I thought its noway getting into the main tree, so no tests.
> > Well I sent this one to the list so that it does not get lost.
>
> Vijay, tests are exactly what you need to get things into the tree!
> And adding the test Huw suggests is very easy, go ahead and
> do that, and repost your patch with the test added (after verifying that
> the test passes on real windows).
>
> Thanks for working on some of these msxml problems!
> - Dan
>
>
>