oleview: The PSDK's ELEMDESC cannot be used with compilers that
don't support nameless unions. So define our own structure so the
test compiles with both the Wine and the PSDK headers.
Francois Gouget
fgouget at free.fr
Fri Oct 20 08:42:05 CDT 2006
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr> writes:
>
> > @@ -537,7 +547,7 @@ int EnumFuncs(ITypeInfo *pTypeInfo, int
> > }
> > bFirst = TRUE;
> > #define ENUM_PARAM_FLAG(x)\
> > - if(pFuncDesc->lprgelemdescParam[j].paramdesc.wParamFlags & x)\
> > + if(((myELEMDESC*)&(pFuncDesc->lprgelemdescParam[j]))->u.paramdesc.wParamFlags & x) \
> > {\
>
> Why can't you use U(x) instead?
My basic assumption is that we want to be able to compile oleview on
Windows. But then I had in mind that this was a conformance test so I
was pretty confused. Still it seems like cmopiling our programs on
Windows should be feasible.
So I modeled my approach on what I remembered of an old commit to
dlls/user/tests/input.c (and menu.c) which had the same issue with the
INPUT type.
The PSDK uses a nameless union whether NONAMELESSUNION is defined or
not. But if we assume that NONAMELESSUNION will never be defined when we
compile with the PSDK headers, then we can use U(x).
--
Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice they're different.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list