LPGL functions in Reactos that are stub in Wine

Saulius Krasuckas saulius2 at ar.fi.lt
Mon Sep 4 15:31:58 CDT 2006

* On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Dan Kegel wrote:
> * On 9/4/06, Saulius Krasuckas <saulius2 at ar.fi.lt> wrote:
> > have you any proof of "all ReactOS code audit process being fake" ?
> The audit went awfully quickly, for one thing,
> and it was done without a neutral third party.
> Wine's been doing its own audit with the help of
> the Software Freedom Law Center.  If ReactOS
> worked with those folks, we'd trust the audit
> results more.

Well, thanks.

> > I very well believe some parts of their code may be dirty, but then 
> > please pinpoint this.  Otherwise you sound like sentencing ReactOS to 
> > death even w/o taking a precise look at it :(
> I'm afraid it's the other way around at this
> point - the burden of proof is on ReactOS to show
> that their code is clean :-(

Now that you have stated Wine already has been through some audit process, 
this is pretty clear.  This is something I wanted to hear, thank you Dan.

BTW, can results of Wine's own audit process be seen somewhere on the web? 
It would be nice to know at least what speed was Wine project audited and 
when did it happen?  How did it influence Wine code size?

I seem to be missing this info for some reason :(

More information about the wine-devel mailing list