Patchwork (was Re: Governance revisited)

[Jeremy White]

I didn't respond to Alexandre's point earlier, but wanted to now:

> To the private email issues, Alexandre replied:
> 
> There are a fair number of such cases, yes. Not so much the bad
> patches but the corrupted/mangled/doesn't apply patches; I don't want
> to fill wine-devel with "this patch is corrupted please resend". And I
> know other people often reply in private too, for instance when
> someone forgot the attachment.

Hmm.  I suppose you (and others) could CC the patch-daemon on any
reply, which could have a similar effect.  Misses objective #1 of
you not having to change anything, but, in theory, keeps the
basic mechanism intact.

Cheers,

Jeremy