Governance revisited

[Robert Lunnon]

On Tuesday 26 September 2006 22:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Lunnon <bobl at optushome.com.au> writes:
> > Well thats at least a reasoned response, even if I don't agree with the
> > reasoning.  But again you simply miss the point. I don't care that
> > Alexandre doesn't move my patches (because its not true that he doesn't)
> > and since I now have a patch management capability which allows me to
> > manage my local tree and keep in sync with wineHQ. But wine is my/our toy
> > now as well as Alexandre's and I for one want to make it better.
> >
> > In that Alexandre and I should be in agreement and perhaps he should
> > consider some of the positive measures I have suggested.
>
> To be honest, I have no idea what it is that you are suggesting. All I
> see is phrases like "community focused process" or "acceptance policy"
> which frankly are just meaningless buzzwords. If you expect anything
> to happen, you'll need to make much more concrete suggestions, and
> provide examples to make us understand how what you are suggesting
> would work in practice, and how it would be different from what we are
> doing now.

Pleased to, 
I'll put my explanations along with suggestions into a material form and 
present them here in a new thread.

Bob