Patchwork (was Re: Governance revisited)

[Jakob Eriksson]

Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> Actually, that's not how I intended things to work. The automatic removal
> from the queue would only happen if the patch had a RFC status, i.e. if
> action is expected from the patch submitter. If the patch is unopposed and
> just waiting in the queue, it should stay there.
> It's reasonable to tell a submitter "you seem to have lost interest in this
> patch, it has been waiting on action from you for [a month, whatever] but
> nothing has happened, therefore it will be removed from the queue". Sending
> a warning message "your patch is going to be dropped without explanation" is
> no improvement over the current situation.
>   

Ok, I misunderstood.  These things are tricky to comprehend and even 
harder to
discuss. :)

// Jakob