Wine vs. Cedega in Benchmarks
Mirek
thunder.m at czela.net
Thu Apr 12 09:30:53 CDT 2007
Tom Wickline napsal(a):
> On 4/12/07, Stefan Dösinger <stefan at codeweavers.com> wrote:
>>
>> But I agree with Henri that a Direct3D performance comparison will be
>> much
>> more interesting.
>>
>
> Well were all three in agreement, I believe a well rounded benchmark
> review is in order ;)
>
> Some test software:
>
> Disk I/O Memory:
> Performance Mark 5.0
> PCMark 04
>
> D3D:
> Aquamark 3
> 3DMark 2000
> 3DMark 2001SE
> 3DMark 2003
> 3DMark 2005
> 3DMark 2006
Nvidia SDK D3D Demos?
>
> OpenGL:
> Dronezmark
> GLExcess
Nvidia SDK OpenGL Demos?
>
> suggestions anyone?
>
>>
I have Cedega 6 installed, but I can't run 3DMark 2001, 2003 or 2006, so
I can't compare performance. Cedega 6 only support Pixel and Vertex
shaders 2.0!
Mirek
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list