New bugzilla components.
truiken at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 00:08:57 CST 2007
On Dec 15, 2007 11:27 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <wine-devel at kievinfo.com> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 2007 11:02 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <wine-devel at kievinfo.com> wrote:
> >> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> >>> Rename wine-kernel -> kernel32, wine-ole -> ole32, wine-opengl -> opengl32,
> >>> wine-user -> user32
> >> Why do you want "32" at the end? Also note that opengl32 is a thunk dll.
> >> Most of it's code somewhere else.
> > It's consistent with the policy: one component per module reported.
> > What do you have against the 32? As opengl32 is a thunk, there
> > shouldn't be any bug reports attributed to that component, and the
> > component shouldn't exist. I'm fine with an opengl keyword if people
> > want it, but as you said, the bug lies elsewhere.
> Assigning openGL bugs to user32 or gdi32 doesn't make it any more clear
> where the problem is. Because in most case that would be somewhere between
> x11drv, gdi32, user32. There are lots of examples like that all over the
> place. Don't forget who designed all this... hm not even sure there was any
> designs actually. Hard assigning bugs to the dll won't make it any better
> then too generic categories like we have now.
> >>> Add gdi32, ntdll, oleaut32, rpcrt4 and any other missing DLL component.
> >> No, please do not add all dlls, listed are fine. That will create huge
> >> clutter. Lets do it one at a time, whenever we need it.
> > I'm fine with waiting for the report to add components, but there are
> > bug reports now that need components that do not exist.
> Then please list them.
As Dmitry already said: ntdl, oleaut32, rpcrt4. Searching through
bugzilla: wininet, wintrust, secur32, advpack, hhctrl, imagehlp,
mshtml, shlwapi, urlmon. There are probably more, but that's a good
More information about the wine-devel