[Fwd: Re: New bugzilla components.]

[James Hawkins]

On Dec 16, 2007 7:53 PM, James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 at sprintpcs.com> wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:        Re: New bugzilla components.
> Date:   Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:52:40 -0700
> From:   James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51 at sprintpcs.com>
> To:     Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry at codeweavers.com>
> References:     <47640A28.7080701 at kievinfo.com>
> <004f01c83f9a$cae2e500$a600fea9 at DMITRY>
> <22821af30712152034t1ee5318ai38eba71df919d38f at mail.gmail.com>
> <200712160933.09187.kai.blin at gmail.com>
> <001101c83fcc$2b6cd490$a600fea9 at DMITRY>
>
>
>
> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> >
> > Users are not supposed to set a category the bug belongs to, this requires
> > an investigation and knowledge of a developer. Personally I'd prefer to have
> > "default" in the list instead of "wine-misc".
> >
> >
> Better choice:  Unknown or intial report.  This will allow a user to
> file a bug without having to get technical.
> This also allows bug triage and for the appropriate developer or
> development team to be notified of a new
> bug.
>

What?  I assume you're talking about adding a new landing page like a
simplified initial bug report.  That has nothing to do with the
current discussion, so please bring that up out of this thread if you
really want that.  Also, we already are notified of new bug reports
through wine-bugs.

> As to listing each and every dll, that would be a mess.  Keep it to
> components and parts and use keywords if necessary
> to identify offending dlls.
>

huh?  No one said to list each and every dll.  I have a feeling you
don't quite understand the issue...

-- 
James Hawkins