[PATCH] ole32: Add CoWaitForMultipleHandles to spec file do it
will be visible to windows apps.
Paul Vriens
paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com
Fri Feb 2 13:59:03 CST 2007
John Morris wrote:
> I'm resubmitting the patch without the changelog entry.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From 4c51e49d432eb8342cadb71a3d539b2e8574849b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: John Morris <mailjohnmorris at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:20:34 -0600
> Subject: ole32: Add CoWaitForMultipleHandles to spec file do it will be visible to windows apps.
>
> ---
> dlls/ole32/ole32.spec | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/ole32/ole32.spec b/dlls/ole32/ole32.spec
> index d775556..3ae0240 100644
> --- a/dlls/ole32/ole32.spec
> +++ b/dlls/ole32/ole32.spec
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
> @ stub CoUnloadingWOW
> @ stdcall CoUnmarshalHresult(ptr ptr)
> @ stdcall CoUnmarshalInterface(ptr ptr ptr)
> +@ stdcall CoWaitForMultipleHandles(long long long ptr ptr)
> @ stdcall CreateAntiMoniker(ptr)
> @ stdcall CreateBindCtx(long ptr)
> @ stdcall CreateClassMoniker(ptr ptr)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Hi,
I thought we use:
@ stub CoWaitForMultipleHandles
for functions that should be exported and are not implemented at all, and use
@ stdcall CoWaitForMultipleHandles(long long long ptr ptr)
where we at least have something in a *.c file (although that could be a simple
return):
HRESULT WINAPI CoWaitForMultipleHandles(<stuff>) {
FIXME("unimplemented stub!\n");
return E_FAIL; <or something alike>
}
Isn't the first one a stub and the second one a semi-stub, or have I mixed up
things?
Cheers,
Paul.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list