Resend 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

[Eric Pouech]

richardvoigt at gmail.com a écrit :
> On 2/17/07, Eric Pouech <eric.pouech at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> Jeff L a écrit :
>> > Eric Pouech wrote:
>> >> Jeff Latimer a écrit :
>> >>> Establish the framework for testing NtCreateMailslotFile.  Have
>> >>> fixed issues with NTSTATUS return codes etc.
>> >> those tests belong to dlls/ntdll, not dlls/kernel32
>> >> also, if the test is for ntdll functions, it shouldn't use kernel32
>> >> ones... hence, NtClose should be used instead of CloseHandle
>> > I put the proposition a while ago about putting the tests in kernel32
>> > as, although they are ntdll functions,  they related to mailslot
>> > functions and relating the tests would be easier on the tester.  I
>> > take it that that is not the case?
>> my call would be to put the tests for functions sitting in DLL X in the
>> directory X/tests, even if we need to rewrite some code (or bother some
>> code from some other tests)
>> but as the API are different, we need in the end the both sets of test
>>
>
> perhaps split out ntdll tests, as in ntdll/tests/kernel32.c ?
>
>
dlls/ntdll/tests/mailslot.c
A+