Sugestion: A few changes to the

[James Hawkins]

On 3/19/07, Giles Cameron <giles at gilesfreeserv.com> wrote:
> After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing
> it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new channels.
>
> They would be like the 'trace' channel, only for more spefic purposes,
> these could by default be compiled out, but when needed put in.
>
> Their primary purpos would be for tracking down bugs in the API, ones
> that may not be as easy to find in a test case.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Also, if more channels is not the way to go, maybe per-function filtering?
>

What you've proposed is very vague...I have no idea what you're
requesting.  We already have channels per dll, what else is needed?

-- 
James Hawkins