Improving http://tests.winehq.org/data/
Francois Gouget
fgouget at free.fr
Thu Oct 25 11:14:14 CDT 2007
Here are some things I noticed while using this site. Let me know if I
it would help to make bug reports for these:
* Some result entries are red with a dash in them and a blue border.
See the Windows 98 results for http://test.winehq.org/data/200710241000/
I assume these means that the test did not load. However we should
distinguish two cases there:
- if it did not run because the tested dll did not exist at all, then
it's not a test failure and thus the background should be green.
A typical case would be the crypt32 tests on Windows 98.
- if the dll was there but the test still did not run, typically
because the dll is missing an export, then that's a bug in the test: it
should dynamically load that function so the other checks it performs
can be run.
A typical case is the gdi32 tests on Windows 98.
Ideally we'd even have a log showing the missing API but that's
probably too tricky to do on Windows.
* Downloading the log file for a given test run gives me a file that's
called 'report'. It would be nice if it was called something like
'vmware-win98-report' instead so that saving a couple of them in a
directory leads to fewer collisions.
* It would be nice if the /data page looked more like a calendar with
the most current date easily accessible, and a less like the directory
listing it currently is. Then a / page would be nice too.
I'm pretty unlikely to fix these, but at least here is a starting if
someone is inclined to do so: you will find the source for the
test.winehq.org website in the tools.git repository:
http://source.winehq.org/git/tools.git/?a=tree;f=winetest
To get hold of the sources, see the instructions there:
http://www.winehq.org/site/git#modules
--
Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr> http://fgouget.free.fr/
War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list