msi: Remove tentative definition of static array with no size specifier

[James Hawkins]

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Talbot
<Andrew.Talbot at talbotville.com> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>
>  >
>  > It's ugly.  What warning are you trying to fix?
>  >
>
>  Although I imagine that gcc doesn't do anything particularly adverse as a
>  result of the existing code, if the pedantic switch were applied it would
>  cause a message of the following type to be generated.
>
>     action.c:236: error: array size missing in ?StandardActions?
>
>  I believe it is also likely to show up under lint-like tools and I believe
>  it is actually an error, though compilers are not required to generate any
>  message, apparently. I couldn't say whether the resultant behaviour is
>  undefined, implemenation defined, or what. And I don't know whether gcc
>  places any surplus baggage in any segment as a result. The fix was just to
>  make the code correct and hence more portable.
>

That's fine, but it's not worth it to me, and I'm pretty sure Julliard
won't accept it either.

-- 
James Hawkins