Documentation is still in CVS?

[Hin-Tak Leung]

--- On Thu, 3/4/08, Dimi Paun <dimi at lattica.com> wrote:

> From: Dimi Paun <dimi at lattica.com>
> Subject: Re: Documentation is still in CVS?
> To: "Wine Devel" <wine-devel at winehq.org>
> Date: Thursday, 3 April, 2008, 6:50 PM
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:37 -0700, Lei Zhang wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the Wine documentation is still
> in CVS, and not
> > in GIT?
> 
> Yes. The docs are now maintained at SourceForge, and given
> the glacial
> pace of updates, there is little reason to move them to
> git. Moreover,
> git presents a much higher barrier to entry, and
> there's no reason to
> raise it for (potentially non-technical) documentation
> contributors.
>

Actually I tried to follow the wiki instructions to do a git-cvsimport and it didn't work a week or two ago; and plain "cvs co" did not work either.
I have a few other stuff on sourceforge, so the problem seems to be specific to wine. Does anonymous check out work for anybody else? 






      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Inbox http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html