Patchwatcher online

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

Hi,

I have one more concern.
Its regarding running of tests.
When running tests for the patch, I think we should just run the tests
of the dlls that are affected direct;y or indirectly by that change.
its running the tests for entire wine, which is very time consuming.
What will happen if we have patch barrage, like once when alexander
comes from vacation.
How much time will that take for verification of the entire patch tree
submitted then.

Just my $0.02

Thanks,
VJ

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Michael Karcher
> <wine at mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 09:45 -0700 schrieb Dan Kegel:
>>> The scripts now run conformance tests and report regressions.
>> Does "Ditto, but just the new error:"<end of output> mean that there are
>> no new errors?
>
> Yes.  Sorry, I'll tidy that up tonight, it really should say "no
> regressions found".
>
>
>