[PATCH] AcceptEx Impelementation
dank at kegel.com
Wed Aug 20 12:05:49 CDT 2008
Scott Lindeneau <slindeneau at gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem was related to a bug in the
> wineserver async implementation that appeared when a file descriptor
> handled its own polling events (like sockets) and garbage collection.
> Fixing the bug fixes the problem i was having earlier. Should I
> include those fixes in a separate patch or can I incorporate them into
> the acceptex patch? (Correct AcceptEx implementation relies on it).
If you can write a conformance test to expose the bug,
then please send that and a patch for the fix, e.g.
as the first two patches in a series:
1/4 async test
2/4 async fix
3/4 acceptex test
4/4 acceptex fix
If no separate test is possible, just fold it in to the AcceptEx patches.
More information about the wine-devel