Patch workflow recommendations (was: Re: shlwapi ...)
Kai Blin
kai.blin at gmail.com
Thu Aug 28 18:13:56 CDT 2008
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 18:15:27 Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 26.08.2008 um 16:46 schrieb Dan Kegel:
> > I updated http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches with that info
> > (and lots more, too)
>
> The git sample commands there differ from the ones given in <http://
> wiki.winehq.org/GitWine#head-
> f7a29e7ed999b5924748a60c5a1cd4a019032d26> by the --keep-subject flag.
> Which one would be the better one?
--keep-subject. As it's in _most_ of the example calls on the GitWine page,
I've fixed the last example.
--keep-subject keeps git format-patch from adding a [Patch] tag on your
subject line. As all emails to wine-patches are supposedly patches, so a
patch tag is kind of pointless.
Cheers,
Kai
--
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
--
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20080829/efb64423/attachment.pgp
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list