gecko download not robust?

[Austin English]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss
<tehblunderbuss at gmail.com> wrote:
> marco wrote:
>  > I looked into it.
>  > And there are some options.
>  >
>  > I can make a separate  package  of gecko  that  I can make it a
>  > dependencie of wine.
>  > Problem is people have to know where to find it or the get stuck.
>  >
>  > I can also make the package and make it not a dependencie on wine but
>  > the the people don't know it exist.
>  >
>  > And I can just put it in the wine package.
>  >
>  > I think this is the best option in this case. Its the easiest option
>  > because people only have to download en install one package.
>  >
>  > marco
>  >
>  This sounds good to me, but lets not compartmentalize wine too much,
>  like Debian.
>  Who wants to find out that you need so many wine* packages in order to
>  get something to work?
>
>
>

Agreed, but I don't think wine, wine-dev, and wine-gecko is too much,
especially considering that wine-gecko rarely changes...

- Austin