Alistair Leslie-Hughes : msvcrt: Implement wcscpy_s.
jjmckenzie51 at sprintpcs.com
Thu Feb 28 06:45:22 CST 2008
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> "James Hawkins" <truiken at gmail.com> writes:
>> If you'll read the tests, you'll see that the first test is correct
>> (although it should really be >= and he should add a test for this).
> No, it shouldn't be >=, there's no reason to fail if the buffer is the
> same size as the data.
The failure should be when the size of the data is more than the
buffer. I think that was the case for the first check. The question
was for the second chunk of code. I think that it should have been less
than. If the size of the data and the size of the buffer are the same,
no change to the size of the buffer is needed.
More information about the wine-devel