programs: add rudimentary dxdiag
xerox_xerox2000 at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 2 18:27:25 CDT 2008
Juan Lang <juan.lang <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056911.html
> Ah. That's not enough to judge where your patches are going.
I already explained, see http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14342 and
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/056659.html. That's what
i was intended to go to.
> series of patches, adding a stub program, then adding a little more to
> it, and so on, would help judge the final product, while considering
> each piece independently.
Here;s the whole patch that i sent a while ago, but i was advised after that to
first sent a simple stub because the patch was too large:
It has the risk of getting rejected partway
> or wholesale, but has a higher likelihood of getting comments. It
> also removes a lot of the roundtrip time with patches.
> Sorry if the guidance isn't very clear. Don't be afraid to ask AJ on
> irc for more feedback too.
Anyway. thanks for your explanation
More information about the wine-devel