Wine-1.0 release notes

[Tom Wickline]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Zachary Goldberg <zgs at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Tom Wickline <twickline at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
>> <wine-devel at kievinfo.com> wrote:
>>> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>>> In any case, we should note why we're making a release in the first
>>>> place, and make it very clear that we believe Wine 1.0 to be the best
>>>> version of Wine yet in all cases (ie, no regressions).
>>>
>>> I'd disagree on "the best" part. Looking at bugzilla and forum people thing
>>> that 0.9.58 and possibly older would qualify more.
>>>
>>
>> 0.9.58 is the best release to date! Office 2007 will run it's best in
>> this release,
>> and has been broke in every release after this. Their are other apps
>> and games that have regressed as well...
>>
>> -Tom
>>
>>
>>
>
> If you know of such cases why didn't you file any regressions in the
> past month during the regression hunt?
>
> -Zach
>

Why, so they could be differed? I would hope most of the full
time hackers here test against Office 07.. so im 100% sure
the regressions are known. And if for some reason their not,
its a hopeless case... and me filing a report or two isn't going to
help very much.

-Tom