Wine compiler options benchmarks

[Anssi Hannula]

Ben Hodgetts (Enverex) wrote:
> Just in-case anyone was ever curious about how well Wine performs with
> different C/XXFLAGs I did a test today with RC5 to see how much of a
> difference it makes with 3DMark 2001 SE, nothing major but if someone
> can think of a better benchmark to try, please let me know (I had hoped
> to try Oblivion or some such but it has no benchmark feature).
> 
> Core2Quad Q9450 @ 3.4Ghz || 4GB PC8500 5-5-5-15 || GCC 4.3.1 || Linux 2.6.25
> 3DMark 2001 SE B300. Wine 1.0-rc5.
> 
> 28576		-march=native -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
> 28522		-march=native -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -mfpmath=sse,387
> 28511		-march=native -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
> 28427		-march=native -O3  -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math
> -funroll-loops -Wall -pipe
> 28426		-march=native -O2 -pipe -mfpmath=sse,387
> 28311		-march=native -O2 -pipe
> 28270		-march=native -Os -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
> 28126		-O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
> 28072		Wine Default (-g -O2)
> 27984		-march=native -O3 -pipe
> 27646		-march=native -Os -pipe

Just for the record, at least on Mandriva we had to disable the use of
-fomit-frame-pointer as it caused problems with some protection systems
("debugger detected" pop-up error).

https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=40034

-- 
Anssi Hannula