winmm/tests: Don't use 0x55 to avoid any confusion when runningwith +heap.

[Francois Gouget]

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
> Perhaps we could agree on a common constant to mark not initialized data in
> tests? I'd suggest to use 0xCC (standard debugging trick) for that purpose.

I'm open to suggestions. So 0xcc is commonly used for this purpose? 
If it's used by debuggers wouldn't this be a reason to avoid it?

If I remember correctly a couple of tests need two values and use both 
0x55 and 0xaa. Do you have another constant to suggest for this case?

-- 
Francois Gouget <fgouget at free.fr>              http://fgouget.free.fr/
The nice thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing quite respectable
                                  -- Paul Dean