Lots of regressions in games in last few versions

Marcel Partap mpartap at gmx.net
Sun May 11 11:04:46 CDT 2008


Tom Wickline schrieb:
> Well its not only Games, if you install office 2007 NOTHING works with RC-1!
> You have to revert back to 0.9.59 for it to work the best it ever did, then
> it's all down hill from each release forward ......As it looks Wine
> 1.0 will be a huge POS......
i don't even see the point of a 1.0 release at this point in time. This project has been a work in 
progress since 15 years. Why the heck has it been decided to do a 'gold' release *now* anyways? This 
actually resembles microsoft's own release policy: set a target date and deliver at that time, 
whatever reasons might speak against that. Why rush 1.0 out of the door? Me personally does not see 
any advantages to name it 1.0 (instead of f.e. 0.9.71), except that development has 'stabilized' 
(i.e. slowed down) - which obviously has not resulted in a more stable product. Anyone in the knows, 
please enlighten me on the motivations behind a release date in June 2008 for v1.0, i simply don't 
get it.
regards marcel.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list