wine build time: 6 (or 3) minutes with q9400

Zachary Goldberg zgold at bluesata.com
Fri Nov 7 20:27:16 CST 2008


On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Hans Leidekker <hans at codeweavers.com>
> wrote:
> >> sec  cpu    wine   notes
> >> 676 e7200 June http://kegel.com/new-computer-2008.html ubuntu 8.04
> >> 615 e7300 Nov
> >> 585 e7400 Nov (estimated, supposedly 5% faster than e7300)
> >> 540 e8400 Nov
> >> 360 q9400 Nov
> >>
> >> In all cases, this was with the default optimization
> >> level, -O2.  Compiling with -O0 was roughly twice as fast
> >> dual core e7300 and e8400 used -j3; quad core -j5.
> >
> > Does your measurement include running configure?
>
> No, nor make depend.  Nor is it cold boot, it's after 'make clean'.
> I didn't control whether there was a previous run, so the cache may be
> warm or cold.
>
> > If I run make -j5 twice after 'make clean' on my q6600 2.4GHz system
> > and take the second measurement I get 223 seconds.
> >
> > This is 64bit Ubuntu 8.10 with gcc-4.3.2 and default
> > optimization. Or perhaps disk IO is playing a role here?
> > I'm using a stripe set of two disks.
>
> Yes, could be disk I/O.  This system has a crappy old parallel IDE drive.
> (Could also be the video; this system has an internal graphics card.)
> - Dan
>
>
> Dan,

Could you post photos and complete specs of the PW cluster somewhere?  I'm
curious :)

-Zach
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20081107/f043739b/attachment.htm 


More information about the wine-devel mailing list