Changed more malloc to HeapAlloc calls

[Pete Myers]

2008/10/30 James Hawkins <truiken at gmail.com>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Pete Myers
> <peterdanielmyers at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > It does match the style of the way that HeapAlloc is used elsewhere in the
> > file, though not malloc admittedly.  I wasn't sure which convention had
> > precedent.
> >
>
> Please bottom-post when replying to a post on the wine lists.  There
> is one test function that uses a space after opening parentheses, but
> it's the exception, not the rule.

Sure, I'll be more careful about both of those in future.

> > I'm afraid that I don't understand how my changelog doesn't match the
> > patch.  I'm new here, can you help me out?  There's obviously something I'm
> > missing!
> >
>
> You had several 'changelog' entries in the email, but the last one was
>
> Changelog:
> * malloc calls in dlls/kernel32/process.c have been change to HeapAlloc
>
> which does not match the patch.

That was a dumb mistake, caused by copying and pasting from a
different patch.  Thanks for your help James, I'll try and fix the
patch then resubmit.

Pete Myers