comctl32: comboex - fix some unintialized variables
austinenglish at gmail.com
Thu Sep 25 03:04:43 CDT 2008
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> You wrote:
>> Fixes a compiler bug when using gcc-4.1
> Wait- which is it, uninitialized variables (as your subject line
> said), or a compiler bug (as your message said)?
Didn't mean to send this one yet, was saving it as a draft until
investigated further, must've clicked send by mistake. Ignore please.
> If it's a compiler bug, which one? Probably
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639, right?
Looks like it.
> Would setting the fields to any random value work as well?
Hmm, possibly. I'll have to investigate more, as I'm not at that machine ATM.
> Can we instead tell the compiler to avoid the bug?
> says there's no way yet to turn warnings on and off for
> individual functions, sadly, but we can do it for individual files.)
Good to know.
> A link to the bug report at gcc.gnu.org, and/or a wine wiki page about
> the general issue, would be helpful.
I'll probably do something along those lines soon. I've been looking
into various GCC CFLAGS/optimizations and have been testing the source
code in various configurations. I'll try to get a wiki going of
compiler bugs/WONTFIX's, etc. But first, I've got to learn more about
what CFLAGS/optimizations/etc. conflict with each other.
More information about the wine-devel