Sources of noise on test.winehq.org?

[Dan Kegel]

The problem with the current arrangement is that when machines pop in and
out, any failures that are more likely on those machines also pop in and
out, so error counts fluctuate, which obscures the smaller changes due to
wine fixes or regressions.
I like the current output, and don't want to change it; I just want to add
another view for people who want to judge progress.

Setting up a view with a fixed set of machines would do, too.  Which is
easier?


On Apr 9, 2009 12:12 PM, "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:

Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> writes: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard at ...
I don't see the point. If you want statistics for a specific machine,
sure, we could generate a page for that. But the global index should
show all the results we have. If it shows too many failures it means the
tests are not robust enough across machines and should be fixed, not
ignored.

--

Alexandre Julliard julliard at winehq.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20090409/d4f826a4/attachment.htm>