[PATCH 5/5] user32/tests: Fix tests on win9x.

Huw Davies huw at codeweavers.com
Tue Apr 21 04:37:03 CDT 2009


On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:34:04AM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Huw Davies wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:22:29AM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
>>> Huw Davies wrote:
>>>> ---
>>>>  dlls/user32/tests/clipboard.c |    7 +++++--
>>>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Was just about to sent a patch along those lines.
>>>
>>> Isn't it better to mark that win9x (and winME as well btw) one as broken()?
>>
>> I was debating with myself whether to mark it as broken or not.  My
>> feeling was that it's not actually broken behaviour rather missing
>> functionality.  But I don't really care.
>>
>> Huw.
>
> Maybe it's not broken() behavior but marking it as broken() makes sure  
> we (Wine) will have CF_UNICODETEXT. Without that broken(),  
> CF_UNICODETEXT can go missing without us knowing.

Yeah, fair enough.  I guess the point is it's broken behaviour for
Wine.  I'll resend, thanks.

Huw.



More information about the wine-devel mailing list