Reparse point unit tests patches

[Paul TBBle Hampson]

I posted a series of patches to add reparse point headers and
junction point unit tests, as a basis from which to fix bug 12401.

Is there any chance of these going in as they are, or do I need to sit
on them until I or someone else implements the functionality they're
testing?

I'm linking to the old version, but git has been happily rebasing them
for me up to and including 1.1.20, so they should still be applicable,
or I can repost the latest versions.

I suspect the relevance of this patch has changed since the change of
fixed disk reported filesystem from NTFS to UnixFS. (ie bug 10601 isn't
dependant on bug 12401 after that change, see bug 10601 comment 23) but
I think it's a good thing to have in the Wine tree anyway.

[PATCH 1/2] Add definitions used by reparse points
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067226.html
[PATCH 2/2] Add unit tests for junction points using reparse point interface
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-January/067227.html

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, B.Sc, LPI, MCSE
Very-later-year Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
Paul.Hampson at Pobox.com

Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did,
we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and
listening to repetitive music.
 -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20090426/54cee814/attachment.pgp>