Is the test.winehq.org front page too pessimistic?
truiken at gmail.com
Wed Feb 11 17:34:18 CST 2009
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> James Hawkins <truiken at gmail.com> writes:
>> We should leave the failing files percentage up (note the name change)
>> and add a failing tests percentage next to it. The failing tests
>> percentage should be total_test_failures / total_tests_run.
> That's not a useful number, many files run a lot of tests, of which a
> huge majority always succeeds. Having a single failure among 10,000
> tests means that the test failed, and it's something bad that should be
> taken care of. Showing that as a 99.99% success would be very misleading.
Ok you're right. I wasn't thinking on that scale. I assumed we had
more than 0.01% failures.
More information about the wine-devel