Proposed goal for website: happily usable at 800x600?

[SorinN]

Years ago I was a happy CLI user - but for nornal browsers Javascript
is OK - for non JS browsers - a noscript version of the website can be
generated - and long page content can be arranged in part1, part2, etc
- accessible via bottom links

2009/2/13 Seth Shelnutt <shelnutt2 at gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Ben Klein <shacklein at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2009/2/13 SorinN <nemes.sorin at gmail.com>:
>> > it could be done with jQuery
>>
>> I hear this a lot. Is it really such a good idea? I'd argue a site not
>> requiring Javascript to function is much cleaner, friendlier and more
>> accessible.
>>
>>
>
> I agree, with the no javascript requirement. I can't tell you how
> frustrating it is if I am using links from the CLI and I hope a site just to
> have it say that because javascript is required I can't access even the
> text. Now I really can't see anyone trying to do anything with wine from the
> CLI, and not having a xserver open to use a better browser though.
>
>
>
>



-- 
Nemes Ioan Sorin