Anything wrong with this patch?

[Jérôme Gardou]

Ben Klein a écrit :
> 2009/1/24 Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com>:
>   
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gardou at gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> Ben Klein a écrit :
>>>       
>>>> I just looked at bug 15616. Maybe you should look at it too.
>>>>
>>>> Also, please hit "Reply to all" so your message gets sent to the
>>>> mailing list too :)
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Of course... Austin English already noticed my patch. Austin, any idea
>>> why it was rejected?
>>>
>>> Sorry for the "reply to all", I forgot it this time...
>>>
>>>       
>> I don't know. I only noticed the empty patch. AJ would be the one to ask.
>>
>> Off hand though, I'd say if you're going to add support for .acm, you
>> should also allow for other native files. iexplore.exe is one
>> candidate, but probably controversial. There are other file extension
>> types missing, I'm sure, though not sure which types off hand.
>>
>>     
>
> Is it really about "supporting"? As AJ points out in his comment,
> nothing stops you from writing in the .acm file, which is almost
> certainly faster than scrolling through the whole list to find it
> anyway.
>
> Isn't the list of DLLs in winecfg long enough already?
>
>
>   
I like to type the beginning of a dll, and just press <tab> to get its 
full name. It is only a matter of comfort. :)