gdi32: Remove unneeded check. (Coverity)
Kai Blin
kai.blin at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 03:32:40 CST 2009
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 18:29:10 Rob Shearman wrote:
> It doesn't make much sense to leave the lcdfilter variable in the
> function if you're going to remove the if condition depending on it,
> since it only has one other use.
> However, It might have been the intention of the author of this code
> that this is setting to be changed at compile time (or runtime through
> a registry tweak) and have the code do the appropriate thing - in that
> case it would have been better to put the variable at the top of the
> file.
I actually have no idea. This was the smallest possible fix that addressed the
coverity issue, but I agree that we need to do something with the lcdfilter
variable.
Looking at the commits responsible for the lcdfilter assignment (028617b9) and
the if check (45a081f1), I don't see anything that hints at why there's an if
check with lcdfilter hardcoded. CCing the original author.
Cheers,
Kai
--
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
--
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20090128/646335fc/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list