First complete test run passing on a Windows platform

Paul Vriens paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com
Fri Jan 30 03:26:16 CST 2009


Reece Dunn wrote:
> 2009/1/30 Ge van Geldorp <ge at gse.nl>:
>>> From: Reece Dunn <msclrhd at googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> The Wine tests are now passing on a Windows XP machine
>>>
>> (http://test.winehq.org/data/4b27dfec939d131c9d7e09f97f14dfc7dabe8843/#group
>> _XP).
>>
>> Actually, that was not the first time. On 20 Jan an XP machine passed:
>> http://test.winehq.org/data/e9d8c9f572998054b1f9c386ea81a3570c65f2d2/#group_
>> XP
>> And on 27 Jan a 2003 machine:
>> http://test.winehq.org/data/8f829034f3fe4da3e7adce2f4685e10ba2e2fe82/#group_
>> 2003
> 
> Nice! Paul Vriens already mentioned this.
> 
> Quite a few of the XP and 2003 machines have 1-3 failures, so this
> should mean that we get more Windows machines running at 0 failures.
> It will also mean that we could potentially use those machines to test
> the inconsistencies in the test runs, like Dan did with the Wine runs
> when setting up patchwatcher.
> 
> This could be used to see exactly what fails when you change the DPI
> settings, for example. Or use a different theme. Or no theme. And
> other things that the user could change, doing them one at a time to
> get a clear "this is what changes when you do X".
> 

See attached screenshot of what I use for my own testing purpose. This of course
works well because I have only 1 system of each platform.

-- 
Cheers,

Paul.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2003_test_runs.png
Type: image/png
Size: 21351 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20090130/d7fb0867/attachment-0001.png 


More information about the wine-devel mailing list