Transl: Getting rid of the conf directory (Part 1)
Paul Vriens
paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 06:38:14 CDT 2009
Paul Vriens wrote:
> Paul Vriens wrote:
>> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>> Paul Vriens <paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Something like the attached splits the loop. We now need to pass that
>>>> array (string) to ver.pl.
>>>>
>>>> Or do you have some other idea's how this could/should be solved.
>>>
>>> I don't think we want to add even more information to pass between
>>> scripts, there is already too much of it IMO. We should probably try to
>>> merge scripts instead.
>>>
>>> Also I'm not sure about skipping of the kernel32 locale files; it seems
>>> to me we could just as well use that as the reference list, and display
>>> every known language and sublanguage. At least it would make the index
>>> page much more impressive ;-)
>>>
>> I actually was thinking the same about both items.
>>
>> The downside of using the locale stuff is of course that our overall
>> translations percentage goes down the drain ;) The upside is that we
>> only need to do one --verify-translation run on kernel32 to get our
>> list of possible translations.
>>
>> I will have a look at merging checkmakefile.pl with ver.pl (already
>> did that while testing).
>>
> I played around a bit and some of the results are shown on the attached
> screenshots.
>
> Is this what you mean? The index page will (in the end) not show any
> neutral languages anymore.
>
> We probably need some nicer sorting, but that looks trivial. Another
> idea is to have English (United States) as some kind of header instead
> of adding it to the table? All other translations are after all compared
> to English (US).
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Please don't look at the columns/numbers, the graphs are correct.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list