ws2/tests: Test AcceptEx with a deferred socket

[Mike Kaplinskiy]

Paul (and anyone who can test on x86_64):

Can you confirm that the new patch gives no failures?

Mike.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Paul Vriens<paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
>>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Does the attached fix test failures on at least NT4? The 4000 test
>> failures is ok, it's just 3999 of the same failure. The failures are
>> the same because of a mistake on my part.
>>
>> I didn't get a chance to test this since my virtualbox is down until a
>> 2.6.31-compatible version of their kernel module is out.
>>
>> Mike.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Paul Vriens<paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This tests the following AcceptEx scenario:
>>>>  WSAAccept->CF_DEFER->AcceptEx
>>>> Windows seems to return the deferred socket with AcceptEx (verified on
>>>> XP & 2K3).
>>>>
>>>> Mike.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> These new tests fail on all NT4 boxes (some 6 and 1 has 4000+ failures)
>>> and
>>> what looks like to be all Windows x64_64 systems. The strange thing (or
>>> maybe not) is that the errors are the same on all of these (one box has
>>> 4000+ failures but still has those same 6).
>>>
>>> See:
>>>
>>> http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/ws2_32:sock.html
>>>
>>> Could you have a look?
>>>
>>> I can do some tests if necessary on NT4, I don't have a Windows x86_64
>>> system however.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Paul.
>>>
> This is what I now get on NT4:
>
> .....
> sock.c:2819: Test failed: Did not get both connections, got 1
> sock.c:2867: Test failed: bytesReturned isn't supposed to be 1
> sock: 441754 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 2 failures), 4 skipped.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: try-fixing-failures.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 4305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20090718/34574924/attachment.diff>