[RFC] named pipe message-mode design

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:
>
>> so - what do people think?  would you agree that a user-space pipe
>> "proxy" is an effective solution?
>
> No, you are on the wrong track. That solution is ugly, inefficient, and
> it doesn't help anything since the wineserver constraints that you are
> trying to avoid obviously apply just as well to your proxy process.

how would you envisage doing client-side SMB named pipes?