[RFC] named pipe message-mode design

[Alexandre Julliard]

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
>> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:
>>
>>> so - what do people think?  would you agree that a user-space pipe
>>> "proxy" is an effective solution?
>>
>> No, you are on the wrong track. That solution is ugly, inefficient, and
>> it doesn't help anything since the wineserver constraints that you are
>> trying to avoid obviously apply just as well to your proxy process.
>
> how would you envisage doing client-side SMB named pipes?

By doing the I/O through the wineserver. It has all the necessary
mechanisms already.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org