AppDB entries are being delete without contacting maintainer by Rozanne
austinenglish at gmail.com
Sat Mar 7 17:56:10 CST 2009
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:46 PM, James McKenzie
<jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Sparr wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Ben Klein <shacklein at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> "Rating: Garbage
>>> What works: Installer
>>> What doesn't work: Starting the game
>>> What wasn't tested: N/A
>>> Additional comments: This works in Crossover Games, but not in Wine"
>>> ^^ I don't have a problem with this. (If it mentioned Cedega/WineX or
>>> ReactOS, I'd probably remove the additional comment, but leave the
>>> test data intact. CodeWeavers products are a special case :) )
>> As a user, I take offense to the favoritism showed here. Codeweavers
>> buying things for winehq should not negatively impact the usefulness
>> of the service for non-codeweavers users. That is, if I pay for
>> Cedega but not for Crossover, why is winehq discriminating against me
>> in terms of what comments it allows?
> Codeweavers supports Wine and provides a lot of assistance with fixing
> bugs. I have not seen a Cedega provide a patch in a long time.
> James McKenzie
Yes, they do, but it's NOT wine. If someone mentions an app works well
in Cedega/Crossover/PlayonLinux, fine. If they submit a howto/test
data for Cedega/Crossover/PlayonLinux, it should be deleted.
Crossover is not special in that regard.
More information about the wine-devel