msvcrt: dont overwrite the standard streams (with test, try 6)

André Hentschel nerv at dawncrow.de
Mon Sep 7 14:45:19 CDT 2009


Eric Pouech schrieb:
> André Hentschel a écrit :
>> Eric Pouech schrieb:
>>  
>>> Hi André
>>> a couple of comments to your patch
>>>     
>> always welcome!
>>
>>  
>>> IMO, we should also test that cbReserved2 is >= sizeof(unsigned)
>>> otherwise we'd be in trouble
>>>     
>> maybe you had something like that patch in mind:
>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-August/077766.html
>> it checks if the size makes sense
>>
>>
>>   
> no
> I'm just saying that since we do something like *(unsigned*)lpReserved,
> we'd better check that cbReserved2 >= sizeof(unsigned)
> I don't think that your patch is correct. If you want a coding of the
> "reserved" block, that you can extend, I think you could well have
> additional information *after* the block of handles+flags we're considering
> 
> therefore the valid tests I see would be:
> cdReserved2 >= sizeof(unsigned)
> numH = *(unsigned*)lpReserved2
> error if sizeof(unsigned) + numH*(1+sizeof(HANDLE)) > cbReserved2
> 
> A+
> 
> 
I already understood the problem you mentioned and sent try 6: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-September/078158.html
So for now this patch fixes a Problem, if we need it we also could check if the calculated size is bigger than the given one. (You were right with that, too)

-- 

Best Regards, André Hentschel



More information about the wine-devel mailing list