[4/7] comctl32/updown: Show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect behaviour for already created control

[Nikolay Sivov]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 09/25/2009 10:27 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>> Paul Vriens wrote:
>>> On 09/20/2009 10:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>>>> From 8981901ce08501229487a1fcd2d430490cb66823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 
>>>>> 2001
>>>> From: Nikolay Sivov<bunglehead at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:52:39 +0400
>>>> Subject: Tests to show that UDS_SETBUDDYINT switching doesn't affect
>>>> behaviour for already created control
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> dlls/comctl32/tests/updown.c | 59
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Nikolay,
>>>
>>> This one (and also "[5/7] comctl32/updown: Fix control behaviour for
>>> UDS_SETBUDDYINT style") add some tests that use UDM_GETPOS32 and/or
>>> UDM_SETPOS32.
>>>
>>> These are only available as of 5.80.
>>>
>>> We are already skipping tests in updown because of this, but not these
>>> new ones yet. Any idea about the cleanest approach?
>> Hi.
>>
>> These could be replaced with UDM_GETPOS/UDM_SETPOS without any problems.
>> Could you make a patch? I'm too busy now, sorry.
>>
>
> Sure, but that will be after the weekend for me as well.
>
Don't bother than, I thought about today fix, I'll do it till Monday.